Excellencies,

Ladies and Gentlemen,

It is a privilege for me to be here in Prague, at Central Europe’s most renowned security conference. This is my first public address since I was elected to lead the European Commission for a second mandate. And Central Europe today is the right place to discuss the choices that Europe faces.

The new reality is that Central Europe is not only geographically at the heart of Europe. But it is also politically and strategically central to the future of the European Union. Last year, the biggest investors in this region were not German or French companies – but Czech companies. Poland is one of Europe’s most dynamic economies. The resilience of most Central European countries in the face of Russia’s war in Ukraine was remarkable. When we talk about competitiveness, Europe’s West has a lot to learn from Europe’s East.

But in the last three years, Europe has discovered another side of this region’s impressive strength. Since Russian tanks rolled into Ukraine, you have become the beating heart of European solidarity. And this is still the case today, after two and a half years of Russian brutality. Almost on the very same day when Prague will celebrate 35 years of the Velvet Revolution, the world will mark 1,000 days of Russia’s full-scale invasion. There is nothing ‘velvet’ about Putin’s war. So many innocent people have been killed. So many cities have been razed to the ground. So many families have been torn apart. One day we will know how many young men and women born in 1989 were killed in 2024. But there is something we already know. Peace cannot be taken for granted. You warned already years ago about Putin’s intentions. We should have better listened to Central and Eastern Europe.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Today, some politicians inside our Union, and even in this part of Europe, are muddying the waters of our conversation about Ukraine. They blame the war not on the invader but on the invaded; not on Putin’s lust for power but on Ukraine’s thirst for freedom. So I want to ask them: Would you ever blame Hungarians for the Soviet invasion of 1956? Would you ever blame Czechs for the Soviet repression in 1968? The answer is very clear: The Kremlin’s behaviour was illegal and atrocious back then. And it is illegal and atrocious today. We Europeans may have different histories. We may speak different languages, but in no language peace is synonymous with surrender. In no language sovereignty is synonymous with occupation. Those who argue to stop support for Ukraine do not argue for peace. They argue for appeasement and the subjugation of Ukraine.

But today I would like to address all those who, after 1,000 days of death and destruction, are asking sincerely: Is it not time for talks? It is first and foremost up to our Ukrainian friends to answer this question. We want the war to stop as soon as possible. But while many outside Europe are pre-occupied only with the end of fighting, my position is that peace is not simply the absence of war. Peace is a settlement that makes war impossible and unnecessary. Therefore, we must put Ukraine in the condition of negotiating such peace. And this is why integration of Ukraine in the European Union is for us at the heart of our peace effort.

If we want true peace, we must fundamentally rethink the foundations of Europe’s security architecture. Russia’s invasion has been an eye-opener for Europe. What lies in ruins are not only Ukrainian cities but also many of our basic security assumptions. For decades, many said that economic inter-dependence was the ultimate source of security. Europe was buying most of Russia’s gas. And this was supposed to be the guarantee that Moscow would never start a new war on the old continent. But this was an illusion. Putin has traded his country’s prosperity for his own imperial ambitions. And our own dependency on Russia has become an asset in Putin’s hands.

What was believed to be a source of security was in fact a source of vulnerability. As Russia started to move its troops towards the border with Ukraine, it also turned off the gas tap to blackmail Europe. We all remember the shock and horror when the full-scale invasion of Ukraine began but also the fear of blackouts in Europe. These fears have never materialised. Europe got the support of all our partners. The United States for example immediately stepped up its LNG deliveries, and Norway increased the pipeline gas deliveries. But we also helped ourselves. We built new infrastructure. We bought energy together. We brought prices under control. But most importantly, we have worked on a structural response to the crisis. We invested massively in renewable energy. And we are investing in the fuels of the future, like clean hydrogen. And the results speak for themselves. In the first half of this year, 50% of all our electricity generation came from renewables. Wind and solar generated more electricity than all fossil fuels combined. Putin’s attempt to blackmail our Union has not only utterly failed, he triggered the boost of European homegrown, renewable energy.

And we have learnt our lesson. When we speak about our energy, we have to produce more of our own energy – more renewable, more nuclear, more efficiency. When we speak about our technologies and our artificial intelligence, we want to design our own European solutions. Innovation and competitiveness are not only an essential part of future prosperity, but they are also an essential part of our long-term security.

There is also a second lesson we have learnt. Europe has overcome its long-standing unwillingness to spend enough on its own defence. And here I come to the point of transatlantic cooperation. I cannot overemphasise the importance of the US’ support for Ukraine since the start of this war. Once again, America has stood up for the freedom of all Europeans. I feel a deep sense of gratitude for this but also a deep sense of responsibility. Protecting Europe is first and foremost Europe’s duty. And while NATO must remain the centre of our collective defence, we need a much stronger European pillar. We Europeans need to have the means to defend and protect ourselves and deter any possible adversaries.

Since the start of the war, we have already made unprecedented progress. Member States have stepped up their defence spending, from just over EUR 200 billion before the war to almost EUR 300 billion this year. And our defence industry has also stepped up to the new reality. We have reopened production lines. We have placed new orders and cut red tape for industry, to produce more and more quickly. But this is not enough. The reality is that even if Europeans take the current security threats seriously, it will take time and investment to re-structure our defence industries. Our aim must be to build continent-size defence output. And Central Europe is well positioned to be one of the drivers and one of the greatest beneficiaries of this new push for the European defence sector. And here the challenge is for small countries and small companies to learn to think big, really big. We must have in mind a systemic overhaul of Europe’s defence. 

Ladies and Gentlemen,

At the beginning of this decade, many illusions have been shattered in Europe. The illusion that peace was achieved once and for all. The illusion that prosperity might matter more to Putin than his delusional dreams of empire. The illusion that Europe was doing enough on security – be it economically or militarily. Today, we cannot afford any more illusions. The second half of the decade will be high-risk. The war against Ukraine and the conflict in the Middle East have put geopolitics in flux. Tensions are also running high in the Far East. We Europeans must be on guard. We must refocus our attention on the security dimension of everything we do. We must think about our Union as intrinsically a security project. And Central Europe has a crucial role to play. You must be at the heart of European security. You must be at the heart of our Union’s future.

Thank you, and long live Europe.